Showing posts with label environment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label environment. Show all posts

Friday, April 1, 2011

Playing the Blame Game

Matthew Lynch - With skyrocketing costs, budget crises, inconsistent curricula, poor standardized testing scores, and poor morale among teachers, administrators, and students, the need for sustainable and pervasive educational change is greater now than ever before.

The numbers of questions related to the quality of the U.S. educational system from multiple sectors of society is at an all-time high. Many American parents have seen reports that American schools rank well below schools in countries such as China and Japan, or have heard President Obama declare a “dropout crisis” in the USA. An abundance of news reports and discouraging case studies has created panic among education stakeholders, who want to know why American school systems are failing. However, many insist on playing the “blame game,” which in most cases is counterproductive.

Many Americans believe that only a small percentage of leaders understand the complexities of the school system, and that individuals who do understand the intricacies of the system use their knowledge to justify the mediocre performance of our teachers and students. The American school system is the best-financed system in the world, but is one of the lowest performing. The American school system as a whole has an appalling performance record. For children living in urban environments, the story is even more alarming. Students from low socioeconomic backgrounds are often educated in dilapidated schools where the too many educators lack the credentials and skills necessary to perform their duties adequately. High student-to-teacher ratios are found in most urban schools, and these schools often lack the resources to deal with the diverse challenges they face, including unruly student behavior. Education has been called the great equalizer, but for students living in poverty-stricken urban areas it is little more than a babysitting service and a place to get a hot meal.

Many question whether the No Child Left Behind Act has contributed to achieving academic success. Although NCLB was well intentioned, it has not lived up to the hopes of government or schools. In the eyes of some, NCLB has actually contributed to subpar academics becoming even worse. If American educators and school personnel do not make a concerted effort to develop effective measures to hold schools accountable for the education of all of our children, then the education crisis will continue.

There is an exception to every rule: some urban school systems are providing a quality education. Unfortunately, however, only a small number of school systems meet the state and federal government student performance requirements. For underperforming urban school systems, the problem usually lies with the inability to sustain existing reform efforts and initiatives. Mayors and school superintendents in these areas often concoct grandiose reform plans that are merely political devices meant to beguile voters into believing they genuinely care about educational reform. The idea that politicians create school reform to gain popularity and votes is sad and sobering. It is discouraging to realize that our children’s futures might be used as a political device to win elections.

Politicians are not the only people at fault for the shoddy education American children are receiving, but no one will take responsibility for subpar educational environments. If administrators were asked who was at fault, they might point to a lack of parental involvement and too few quality teachers. If teachers were asked who was at fault they might also cite a lack of parental involvement and ineffective administration. If parents were asked who was at fault they might blame teachers and school administrators. Society in general seems to conclude that the lack of quality teachers, effective administration, and parental involvement are all factors contributing to educational failure.

Whatever the reason, Americans have become the laughing stock of the free world when it comes to K-12 education. The solution, of course, is for the country to unite and work together to carry the responsibility of enriching and continuing America’s future via educational excellence without playing the “blame game.”
source:http://www.educationnews.org/commentaries/152844.html

Friday, March 11, 2011

Exciting new developments in Cambridge Pre-U for September 2011

Exciting new Cambridge Pre-U developments for September 2011: Cambridge Pre-U Biology, Drama and Theatre, Mathematics Short Course.

We are investing in the development of many aspects of Cambridge Pre-U as demand from schools grows.

One strand is syllabus development. Schools want to extend the Cambridge Pre-U approach to more subjects, and we are integrating feedback from teachers into our range of syllabuses.

We have three new Cambridge Pre-U syllabuses for first teaching in September 2011:
Cambridge Pre-U Drama and Theatre
A new subject for Cambridge Pre-U - as schools requested.
Cambridge Pre-U Drama and Theatre provides an excellent foundation for studying drama and theatre at university level - combining academic rigour with significant credit for practical work.
It helps students to make a strong application for university study in other subjects, because of the combination of academic rigour and creative work.
Students can explore their interests in depth, with a free choice of dissertation.
It helps students develop a wide perspective on world theatre.

Cambridge Pre-U Biology
Cambridge Pre-U Biology offers learners an ideal foundation for university-level studies. We have developed and revised the course with schools ad universities.
We have refocused the content and approach after feedback from schools that wanted to be confident their students had time to cover all the course material in two years.
Cambridge Pre-U Biology now combines four underlying themes for studying biology.
Teachers can use all four underlying themes to unify their teaching or select from the four: cell biology, Evolution and the fundamentals of life, whole organisms biology, environmental biology.
Encourages learners to develop their problem solving, handling information, practical, experimental and investigative skills.
Cambridge Pre-U Biology helps teachers create a motivating and engaging mosaic of different learning experiences and teaching approaches --- context-based and learner-centred, or content-based, teacher-led approach; or a combination of the two approaches.

Cambridge Pre-U Mathematics (Pure Mathematics and Statistics) Short course
Understanding mathematical concepts is vital for success on many degree courses as well as mathematics, physics ad engineering.
That's why we have consulted closely with teachers and universities about a new mathematics course --- to support students studying other subjects, such as biology, chemistry, economics, geography and business.
It will help students applying for university --- by showing they can deal confidently with the mathematical concepts that complement their chosen degree course.
The qualification is designed for one year's study and Ofqaul has just accredited it. We will publish the syllabus very soon.

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Environment ministry rejects proposal for IIT in Indore

New Delhi: A proposal for the setting up of anIndian Institute of Technology (IIT) in Indore has been put on hold by the Ministry of Environment and Forests for the time being.

Indore currently is also home to an Indian Institute of Management (IIM).

The government of Madhya Pradesh had sought permission from the Forest Advisory Committee (FAC) of the environment ministry for acquiring 80 hectares of forestland for the establishment of the proposed IIT. 


The proposed IIT had been sanctioned to the state of Madhya Pradesh by the Human Resource Development ministry in the eleventh five year plan.


The approval of the government under the Forest Conservation Act is required for the diversion of forestland for any purpose, except for one hectare of forestland for the construction of building that are of public importance such as schools, hospitals, community halls and dispensaries.

The proposal for acquiring the land for the IIT in Indore was rejected by the FAC as it said that the diversion of too much of forestland will damage the ecological balance in and around the area of Indore. 

Had the proposal been accepted by the environment ministry, Indore would have acquired the distinction of being the only city in India to have both an IIM as well as an IIT.

The FAC stated in its report that the proposal for diverting the forestland situated in the vicinity of an important city for the establishment of a non-specific project such as an IIT without taking up a detailed exercise for examining all feasible alternatives would be rejected.

The proposal would have meant the cutting down of around 7,164 trees in the forestland that has a density of 89.55 trees per hectare. An official informed that the area where the proposed IIT would have been set up is a reserved forest land of good quality and there is not much good forestland around Indore.

Another reason for the proposal being rejected was that the committee found that the land in Hasalpur village that was indicated in the proposal for compensatory afforestation was found to be not suitable for raise plantation and no alternative land for afforestation had been mentioned in the proposal.

The Eric Friedheim Library: Events and Classes

Business Affiliate Programs •  Sale •  Personals •  Advertising •  Shopping

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...