Showing posts with label NATO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NATO. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

France, Britain say NATO must step up Libya bombing

The criticism by London and Paris followed new shelling of Misrata on Monday and the collapse of an African Union peace initiative

France and Britain, who first launched air attacks on Libya in coalition with the United States, said on Tuesday NATO must step up bombing of Moammar Gadhafi’s heavy weapons to protect civilians.

NATO took over air operations from the three nations on 31 March but heavy government bombardment of the besieged western city of Misrata has continued unabated with hundreds of civilians reported killed.

The criticism by London and Paris followed new shelling of Misrata on Monday and the collapse of an African Union (A U)peace initiative.

Echoing rebel complaints, Juppe told France Info radio, “It’s not enough.”

He said NATO must stop Gadhafi shelling civilians and take out heavy weapons bombarding Misrata.

British foreign secretary William Hague also said NATO must intensify attacks, calling on other alliance countries to match London’s supply of extra ground attack aircraft in Libya.

NATO, which stepped up air strikes around Misrata and the eastern battlefront city of Ajdabiyah at the weekend under a U N mandate to protect civilians, rejected the criticism.

“NATO is conducting its military operations in Libya with vigour within the current mandate. The pace of the operations is determined by the need to protect the population,” it said.

Libyan state television said on Tuesday a NATO strike on the town of Kikla, south of Tripoli, had killed civilians and members of the police force. It did not give details.

Peace talks fail

The spat within the alliance came after heavy shelling and street fighting in the coastal city of Misrata on Monday where Human Rights Watch says at least 250 people, mostly civilians, have died.

Libyan rebels rejected an African Union peace plan on Monday because it did not include the removal of Gadhafi, who they accused of indiscriminate attacks on his own people.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy, hailed as a hero by the rebels, led calls for military intervention in Libya and his warplanes were the first to attack Gadhafi’s forces.

In a barbed reference to the NATO takeover, Juppe added: “NATO must play its role fully. It wanted to take the lead in operations, we accepted that.”

NATO is unpopular among many insurgents, both because they believe it initially reacted slowly to government attacks and because it has killed almost 20 rebels in two mistaken bombings. Although they have recently praised the alliance after its attacks helped break a major government assault on Ajdabiyah, many of the rebels in the field still hailed Sarkozy. The rebels took up position about 40 km west of Ajdabiyah on Tuesday after clashes on Monday that left at least three of their fighters dead in a rocket attack.

There was no sign of fighting on Tuesday between Ajdabiyah and the oil port of Brega where the eastern front has see-sawed between the combatants for weeks.

The Red Cross said it would send a team to Misrata to help civilians trapped by fighting.

Rebel leader Mustafa Abdel Jalil said after talks with an African peace mission in rebel-held Benghazi on Monday:

“The African Union initiative does not include the departure of Gadhafi and his sons from the Libyan political scene, therefore it is outdated.”

The AU said in a statement it would continue the mission.

Gadhafi’s son Saif ruled out his father stepping down, calling the idea ridiculous.

Amnesty International on Tuesday accused Gadhafi forces of executing prisoners, killing protesters and attacking refugees.

Scorn
Rebels in Misrata, their last major bastion in western Libya and under siege for six weeks, scorned reports that Gadhafi had accepted a ceasefire, saying they were fighting house-to-house battles with his forces.

Rebels said that Gadhafi’s forces had intensified the assault, for the first time firing truck-mounted, Russian-made Grad rockets into the city, where conditions for civilians are said to be desperate.

NATO attacks outside Ajdabiyah on Sunday helped break the biggest assault by Gadhafi’s forces on the eastern front for at least a week. The town is the gateway to the rebel stronghold of Benghazi 150 km north up the Mediterranean coast.

Gadhafi’s former foreign minister Moussa Koussa, speaking in Britain where he fled in March, called on “everybody, all the parties, to work to avoid taking Libya into a civil war”.

“This will lead to bloodshed and make Libya a new Somalia,” he told the BBC. “More than that we refuse to divide Libya. The unity of Libya is essential to any solution and any settlement in Libya.”

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

UK, France, US propose no-fly zone over Libya

Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff, warned last week that enforcing a no-fly zone in Libya would be “extraordinarily complex”

A proposed no-fly zone over Libya would have numerous logistical obstacles and offers no guarantee of achieving the goal of halting government attacks, US officials and analysts say.

Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff, warned last week that enforcing a no-fly zone in Libya would be “extraordinarily complex.”

Others have pointed out that this would be an act of war and would likely require a United Nations resolution as a legal basis.

Analysts note that Libya is four times the size of Iraq, even if the population is concentrated along the coast. Any enforcement would require the use of AWACS radar aircraft, refueling tankers and warplanes to block radar and communications of Libyan aircraft.

Helicopters and rescue crews would also be needed to recover any pilots lost over the North African country.

Barry Watts of the center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments said this would require 50 to 70 aircraft operating each day.

“The bigger problem might be finding air bases close enough to operate,” he said. “Italy comes to mind, but the Italians would have to approve it.”

The warplanes used in a no-fly zone would need a land base or aircraft carrier. There is no carrier in proximity to Libya, although the USS Enterprise is in the Red Sea and the French carrier Charles de Gaulle is in the Mediterranean port of Toulon.

Britain and France have made the most aggressive calls among Western powers for a no-fly zone to hamper Libyan strongman Mauammar Gaddafi offensive. The United States has said it is studying the possibility while warning of the major military operation it would entail.

Colonel David Lapan, a Pentagon spokesman, said US military planners are examining what would be needed for a no-fly zone if President Barack Obama issues such an order.

“Military planners are looking at all the various options to be able to present to the president a full range, so they would look at sea-based assets, land-based assets, basically what it would take should that decision be made,” Lapan said.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said any no-fly operation “begins with an attack on Libya to destroy the air defenses. That’s the way you do a no-fly zone.”

Anthony Cordesman of the center for strategic and international studies, a Washington think tank, said any such operation would have to quickly demonstrate superiority over Libyan forces.

“You wouldn’t risk any US or other force simply being caught up in constant surface-to-air attacks and ambushes,” he said.

“The problem is in enforcing something like this, you want to have a decisive act, you want to create a situation where there is no Libyan willingness to take risk or engage.”

Libya has around 100 SA-2 anti-aircraft missiles designed in the 1950s and another 70 SA-6 missiles which are more recent, according to Globalsecurity.org.

Libya has around 300 warplanes, mostly Russian-made MIG-23s and MIG-25s, around half of which are not operational, according the security website.

Cordesman said a no-fly zone for fixed-wing aircraft is easier to implement than one that deals with attack helicopters “which are harder to track and attack.”

But he said that Kadhafi’s forces “could potentially suppress the rebels regardless of a no-fly zone.”

Similar concerns about the effectiveness of a no-fly zone came from the US envoy to NATO, Ivo Daalder.

“No-fly zones are more effective against fighters but they really have a limited effect against his helicopters or the kind of ground operations that we’ve seen,” he said.

“Which is why a no-fly zone, even if it were to be established, isn’t really going to impact what is happening there today. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t look at it,” Daalder said in a conference call.

The Eric Friedheim Library: Events and Classes

Business Affiliate Programs •  Sale •  Personals •  Advertising •  Shopping

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...